>
# visible structures.mws
>
restart;
>
with(plots): # this is needed later for 'display'
Warning, the name changecoords has been redefined
>
Seeing
(of a
sort
)
is believing
(up to a
point
)
...
John Cosgrave, Mathematics Department,
St. Patrick's College, Drumcondra, Dublin 9,
IRELAND
[email protected]
Acknowledgement
. The inspiration for this Maple worksheet was an article (rather one particular diagram in an article: Figure 1 on page 899) -
Visible Structures in Number Theory
- by Peter Borwein and Loki J�rgenson in the December 2001 issue of the
American Mathematical Monthly
; their diagram
illustrates
that the
sum
of the Archimedean series (as I refer to it)
+ ...
ad infinitum
is
.
Preamble
. Forget about the technology (for the moment); just use your
imagination
... Here's something I first read somewhere when I was at school; it relates to the sum of the infinite series:
+ ...
ad infinitum
whose
sum
is 2.
Here's how one may
see
the (essential) truth of that:
take in hand (imagine having) a piece of string,
L
, of
length
2, and
-
cut that string into two pieces,
and
, of equal length; then one has:
(hardly a surprise!)
-
cut that string
into two pieces,
and
, of equal length (
); then one has:
-
cut that string
into two pieces,
and
, of equal length (
); then one has:
-
cut that string
into two pieces,
and
, of equal length (
); then one has:
..............................
-
cut that string
into two pieces,
and
, of equal length (
); then one has:
+ ... +
The crux
. Now
imagine
the original string cut into an
infinite
number of pieces:
-
one piece having length 1
-
a
piece having length
-
a
piece having length
-
a
piece having length
-
a
piece having length
... and so on
ad infinitum
Then (stating the intuitive:) the length of the original string is equal to the total sum of the individual pieces of string, we would
see
that:
+ ...
ad infinitum
Moving on
. Elsewhere I have explained that the first genuine example of what is now called an infinite series could be said to have occurred implicitly in the work of Archimedes (though that is bending the true history... , as mathematical historians will know; however I never let historical accuracy get in the way of the more important issue: understanding mathematical
ideas
)
I have attempted elsewhere to convey to you (my students), that one of the initial hurdles to be overcome in connection with understanding
infinite
series is that of
realising
that it is a non-trivial problem to
define exactly
what is
meant
by the
sum
of such a series... .
Recall that
naively
one might
think
every series (within reason, of course) actually
has
a sum, and one
might
also think that the
only
problem is to find - by some clever method (
Let
S be the sum of the series, then multiplying S by ... , and then subtracting, and then ... , and so the actual value of S is ...
) or whatever - the value of that sum...
The aim of this worksheet is to show some pictures which
attempt
to reinforce an
understanding
of the sums of certain infinite series. I will begin by setting up some pictures which allow one to
see
(but your
imagination
will play a very big role in all this!) that the series encountered in the Archimedes work:
+ ... +
+ ...
ad infinitum
, has sum
.
This is what I am going to do:
-
First I am going to show you
a
picture, in which you will see some squares fitting together in a certain (
clever
) way; it is the
initial
part of a picture that
no
computer could construct, because the picture that I want you to
see
can only be
seen
in your
imagination
... (later I will show you an animation whose final frame is this single, static picture...)
Figure 1 in the Borwein-J�rgenson December 2001
Monthly
article
-
Next I give some
details
about those squares:
0. The largest, outer square has side length 2,
and as for the green squares, starting at the bottom left-hand corner:
1. the
of them has side
length
1, and so has area...
2. the
of them has side
length
(simply
the length of the
square)
3. the
of them has side
length
(simply
the length of the
square)
4. the
of them has side
length
(simply
the length of the
square)
... ... ... ... ...
k
. the
of them has side
length
(simply
the length of the
square)
-
Lastly, I ask you this question:
How
does the
imagined diagram
support the claim that the
sum
of the
infinite
series
+ ... +
+ ...
ad infinitum
is
?
Comment
. Notice, by the way, that the
side length
- 2 - of the above square
is
the
sum
of the
infinite
series:
+ ...
In the following Maple program, I am simply forming the first 7 partial sums
, ... ,
of the infinite series:
+ ... +
+ ...
ad infinitum
they are given by:
, etc
In short, we have:
,
for
.
>
n := 7: s[1] := 1:
for k from 2 to n do
s[k] := s[k-1] + 1/2^(k-1) od:
seq(s[k], k = 1..n);
>
s[0] := 0: for r to n do
square||r := PLOT(seq(POLYGONS([[s[k-1],s[k-1]], [s[k],s[k-1]],[s[k],s[k]], [s[k-1],s[k]]], COLOUR(RGB,0,1,0)), k=1..r)):
above||r := PLOT(seq(POLYGONS([[s[k-1],s[k]], [s[k],s[k]],[s[k],2], [s[k-1],2]], COLOUR(RGB,0,0,1)), k=1..r)):
below||r := PLOT(seq(POLYGONS([[s[k],s[k-1]], [2,s[k-1]],[2,s[k]], [s[k],s[k]]], COLOUR(RGB,0,0,1)), k=1..r)):
outer_square := PLOT(POLYGONS([[0,0],[2,0],[2,2], [0,2]], COLOUR(RGB,1,1,1))):
show||r := display([square||r, above||r,
below||r, outer_square]):
od: display([show||(1..n)], insequence=true);
>
# display([show||n]); # to make the initial picture
>
Comment
. Motivated by the above (which requires an in-class discussion) there are many directions in which one might go, but one obvious one is to ask: what other infinite series might have their sums illustrated by varying the above diagram: for example by dividing a square into a 3 by 3 (or 4 by 4, etc) grid...
The following (which requires some discussion is an initial step down that road)...
>
n := 10: s[1] := 1:
for k from 2 to n do
s[k] := s[k-1] + (2/3)^(k-1) od:
seq(s[k], k = 1..n);
>
s[0] := 0: for r to n do
square||r := PLOT(seq(POLYGONS([[s[k-1],s[k-1]], [s[k],s[k-1]],[s[k],s[k]], [s[k-1],s[k]]], COLOUR(RGB,0,1,0)), k=1..r)):
above||r := PLOT(seq(POLYGONS([[s[k-1],s[k]], [s[k],s[k]],[s[k],3], [s[k-1],3]], COLOUR(RGB,0,0,1)), k=1..r)):
below||r := PLOT(seq(POLYGONS([[s[k],s[k-1]], [3,s[k-1]],[3,s[k]], [s[k],s[k]]], COLOUR(RGB,0,0,1)), k=1..r)):
outer_square := PLOT(POLYGONS([[0,0],[3,0],[3,3], [0,3]], COLOUR(RGB,1,1,1))):
show||r := display([square||r, above||r,
below||r, outer_square]):
od: display([show||(1..n)], insequence=true);
>
>
n := 14: s[1] := 1:
for k from 2 to n do
s[k] := s[k-1] + (3/4)^(k-1) od:
seq(s[k], k = 1..n);
>
s[0] := 0: for r to n do
square||r := PLOT(seq(POLYGONS([[s[k-1],s[k-1]], [s[k],s[k-1]],[s[k],s[k]], [s[k-1],s[k]]], COLOUR(RGB,0,1,0)), k=1..r)):
above||r := PLOT(seq(POLYGONS([[s[k-1],s[k]], [s[k],s[k]],[s[k],4], [s[k-1],4]], COLOUR(RGB,0,0,1)), k=1..r)):
below||r := PLOT(seq(POLYGONS([[s[k],s[k-1]], [4,s[k-1]],[4,s[k]], [s[k],s[k]]], COLOUR(RGB,0,0,1)), k=1..r)):
outer_square := PLOT(POLYGONS([[0,0],[4,0],[4,4], [0,4]], COLOUR(RGB,1,1,1))):
show||r := display([square||r, above||r,
below||r, outer_square]):
od: display([show||(1..n)], insequence=true);
>